✔ Scroll down and test yourself — answers are hidden under the “View Answer” button.
Attempt all questions first.
✔️ Click SUBMIT at the end to unlock VIEW ANSWER buttons.
Top 50 Normalization in RDBMS MCQs with Answers (2025 Update) – SET01
Welcome to your essential practice hub for mastering Normalization in Relational Database Management Systems (RDBMS). This curated set of Top 50 multiple choice questions (MCQs) focuses on crucial concepts of normalization — a foundational topic in database design that helps reduce data redundancy, eliminate anomalies, and enable efficient relational schemas. Whether you’re preparing for university exams, DBMS quizzes, or technical interviews, this updated question set with clear explanations delivers high-impact preparation in one place. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Inside this quiz, you’ll explore essential topics such as first, second, and third normal forms, functional dependencies, partial and transitive dependencies, normalization rules, dependency preservation, and decomposition strategies that ensure lossless joins and optimal schema design. Each question includes a detailed answer to help you deepen your understanding of how normalization shapes real-world database structures. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Use this MCQ set to consolidate your knowledge of RDBMS normalization theories, enhance your exam readiness, and confidently tackle questions on database design principles that often appear in competitive tests and placement assessments.
Explanation:
A is a candidate key (A → B → C → D). There is a transitive dependency (A → B and B → C), so 3NF is violated. Since the key is single-attribute, 2NF holds. Hence highest NF = 2NF.
Explanation:
A partial dependency exists because A (a part of the composite key) determines a non-key attribute C. Partial dependencies violate 2NF.
Explanation:
Repeating groups mean attributes are not atomic. That violates 1NF, which requires atomic (non-repeating) attribute values.
What is meant by repeating groups?
Following relation is not in First Normal Form (1NF).
| StudentID | StudentName | Courses |
| 101 | Arun Kumar | DBMS, AI, Networks |
| 102 | Meera Devi | DBMS, ML |
Why this violates 1NF?
- The column Courses contains multiple values in a single cell.
- In 1NF, every attribute must hold atomic (indivisible) values only.
- A repeating or multi-valued attribute breaks the rule of atomicity.
Explanation:
Second Normal Form (2NF) is specifically defined to remove partial dependencies that arise when a non-prime attribute depends on part of a composite key.
Refer here to know more about Partial Key DependencyExplanation:
From AB → C and C → A, AB+ = {A,B,C} so AB is a key. C+ gives {C,A} but not B, so C alone is not a key. Therefore AB is the (only) key.
Explanation:
To eliminate the transitive dependency, split R(X,Y,Z) into R1(X,Y) and R2(Y,Z). This preserves the direct dependencies and removes transitivity. This is called dependency preserving decomposition.
Explanation:
3NF removes transitive dependencies (non-key attribute depending on another non-key attribute).
What is transitive dependency?
A transitive dependency in a relation exists when a non-prime attribute depends on another non-prime attribute, which in turn depends on a key attribute. In simple words: If A → B and B → C and A is a key attribute, C is not part of any key, then C is transitively dependent on A through B.Explanation:
BCNF is stricter than 3NF and 2NF, so a BCNF relation is necessarily in 2NF and 3NF (and 1NF as well).
Correct (precise) answer: PS — PS is a candidate key (not listed in the original choices).
Reasoning (closures)
- P+: start with
{P}
P → Q→ addQ→ now{P,Q}
Q → R→ addR→ finallyP+ = {P, Q, R}
→ S is not included. - Q+:
{Q,R}(sinceQ → R) — not a key. - P S (PS)+: start with
{P,S}
using the two FDs we getQ(fromP → Q) and thenR(fromQ → R)
so(PS)+ = {P, S, Q, R}— all attributes of the relation.
Minimality check:
P+ = {P,Q,R}(missing S) → P alone is not a key.S+ = {S}(missing P,Q,R) → S alone is not a key.
Therefore PS is a candidate key (it determines all attributes and is minimal). The original options A–D are all not keys unless the question implicitly stated some FD for S (which it did not).
Explanation:
BCNF decomposition algorithms guarantee a lossless join, but they can sometimes break dependency preservation (some FDs may not hold on individual decomposed relations).
No comments:
Post a Comment